Henry Raymond
Fairfax News => Current News & Events => Topic started by: David Shea on September 02, 2010, 06:45:24 AM
-
Friends of ours had a four wheeler stolen from their yard. Authorities were notified and told the homeowner that they would keep any eye our for the property, but not to have high hopes of ever getting it back.
Description:
2007 Yahama Grizzly 400 4 Wheeler ( green in color )
Criminals know that police are at a disadvantage when it come to making arrests.
This family of young children feels personally violated by the criminals. They feel as though they were being watched / stalked by the individual or individuals.
What is it going to take to send a clear "message" to the criminals?
-
I dont know ,the human side of me says shoot shovel and shut up, but the christian side says forgive and forget
-
In my opinion there is only one side.
-
Dave please send me a message with the description of the four wheeler and where it was taken from.. if it is in Fairfax still trust me I can find it I've already got a couple people in mind.
-
What is it going to take....? A village. or in this case, a posse.
-
A description of the ATV posted here would be good. You never know when somebody starts running their mouth to someone and then that person starts running their mouth and on and on.....................Posse? sign me up :-) I will get the word out up this way.
-
Don't these things have VIN numbers? Thought anyone who drove them off of their own property needed a registration & plates and had to register the VIN through DMV.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong Josh, but I don't think we need to register our atvs with the dmv in vermont. Usually when something like this happens a posse is what it comes down to. About 14 years ago there was someone running thru fairfax, fletcher, and fairfield stealing farmers atvs and even burning some of them. There was alot of speculation as of what happened but lets just say all of a sudden people weren't missing 4-wheelers anymore.
-
Vigilantism is not the way to go. We are a nation, and town, of laws.
-
Unfortunately - we're a nation, and a town, with fiscal predicaments which prevent us from ENFORCING the sort of 'Laws' need to feel safe from these issues.
We all chose to live out in the sticks. And this is what happens. AT THE SAME time though, small towns/rural communities have their own ways of maintaining order. They don't neccesarily need VIOLENT vigilantism. When you organize and agree to limitations... it goes from vigilante posse to 'Neighborhood Watch'. I don't see it written anywhere that berating and making little stealing pukes wet themselves was going to get you landed in jail.
-
This nation was founded on vigilantism was it not? If we would have laid down our arms, and not stood up to the British this country would not be what it is today. A lot of people scoff at some of our rights and at some of the amendments today, saying its a new day and age, and that they are dated. Those are also the same people that have allowed our government to allow criminals to have more rights then law abiding citizens. So I guess today its a personal choice, would you rather sit back and assure yourself that law enforcement will protect you and all your belongs. Then reality sets in and law enforcement tells you "they would keep any eye out for the property, but not to have high hopes of ever getting it back". Or be vigilant (to be keenly alert to or heedful of trouble or danger, as while others are sleeping or unsuspicious) and possibly confront someone that either chooses to harm your family or steal, damage, or vandalize your property. Personal choice I guess but I know what mine would be.
-
Fairfax Residents,
I spoke with our friends this morning regarding the four wheeler. They are very thankful that so many people in Fairfax are supportive of them. The family would still like to remain anonymous but have asked me to post a description of the stolen property.
2007 Yahama Grizzly 400 4 Wheeler ( Green In Color )
The family used the machine to plow their driveway in the winter. Any information leading to the individuals that have the machine would be appreciated.
Regards
Dave Shea
-
There is a huge difference between being vigilant, and engaging in vigilantism, as the word is commonly understood. I'm not talking about the official definition, but what it actually means to most people who use it. The main difference between being vigilant and being a vigilante is the implication of unlawful action in pursuit of justice. Loctavious clarified that it wasnt meant to advocate violence to achieve justice. Though personally, I would take it further and say that any unlawful action, whether it be for a just cause or not, is still unlawful and the violators be subject to the law as well.
Also I believe to equate a crime committed by one citizen, with the oppression of the Colonists by the British is a false equivalency. The first is the unlawful act of one person, the other was an entire nation-system relegating its colonies and their inhabitants to a second-class status within the British Empire. It is melodramatic to suggest they are the same thing.
What do you think Josh?
-
You guys got me curious -- I always thought vigilante was more about taking the punishment in your own hands, such as vigilante justice. So I looked up the meaning in Webster's:
Vigilante : a member of a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime summarily (as when the processes of law are viewed as inadequate); broadly : a self-appointed doer of justice
Vigilant : alertly watchful especially to avoid danger
I think that's your answer right there. Be vigilant but not a vigilante.
-
Thanks for posting the description of the ATV. Yikes, we have one just like it. We'll get word around, if we hear anything we'll notify the authorities or not........................just kidding!
Also, thanks for the comments from Loctavious and ShadyLane, diito.
-
I like: "shoot shovel and shut up" (but only if the intruder is armed AND in my house.
Since we are a "nation of laws" (discussion about effectiveness deferred), as citizens, what "LEGAL" rights do we have to detain someone we catch on our property attempting to steal or damage private property? None?
-
Found this info:
Here's what the Vermont Law is: 13 VSA § 4954. Arrest without a warrant.
The arrest of a person may be lawfully made by an officer or a private citizen without a warrant upon reasonable information that the accused stands charged in the courts of Vermont or another state with a crime punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. When so arrested, the accused shall be taken before a superior judge, assistant judge of the superior court, or judge of a district court as soon as may be and complaint shall be made against him under oath setting forth the ground for the arrest as in section 4953 of this title; and thereafter his answer shall be heard as if he had been arrested on a warrant. Amended 1965, No. 194, § 10, operative February 1, 1967; 1973, No. 193 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. April 9, 1974.
I'm not certain of this, but I'm assuming there must be a VT law related to home invasion that would be punishable by more than a year in prison.
-
Was it green in color?
-
Despite all the legalese, it's unlikely that a citizen's arrest would be successful w/o the use of some kind of weapon, be it a bat, shovel, firearm or brute force. Suggesting that that the criminal element could be caught without show of some force or intent of seems particularly ridiculous.
These are not cats. Shaking a box of food and calling "here kitty,ktty" is not going to have the desired affect in this case. I don't advocate violence by any means, we are supposed to be a civilized society with laws/rules et-al; however, thieves among the law abiding flout the laws because they know they will get away with it 99-100% of the time because law enforcement really just shrugs and says "oh well, not much we can do about it."
Why is that? Having been a victim of robbery in this town some years back, we were told the exact same thing. If the people in charge of "doing something about it" can't or won't who does that leave? A group of citizens left to protect themselves from thieves with more rights and freedom. A more negative connotation is a vigilante posse.
I'm all for peaceful resolutions and would like to see this four wheeler located in someone's garage and have the authorities confront the person. I would like to see some kid get his butt kicked by his parents, since it obviously didn't happen enough before, if he felt so entitled to avail himself of someone else's property.
We all chose to live out in the sticks. And this is what happens. AT THE SAME time though, small towns/rural communities have their own ways of maintaining order. They don't neccesarily need VIOLENT vigilantism. When you organize and agree to limitations... it goes from vigilante posse to 'Neighborhood Watch'. I don't see it written anywhere that berating and making little stealing pukes wet themselves was going to get you landed in jail.
I couldn't agree more
-
Vermont's DMV website has a "readable" guide regarding ATVs, including registration, titling, equipment and operating and age requirements. http://dmv.vermont.gov/publications. With a couple of exceptions, an ATV must be registered to be operated anywhere except on land owned by its owner and ATVs with a model year of 2004 or after must be titled.
Perhaps some of the problems that arise, including accidents involving children, unauthorized use, damages and even theft could be alleviated if it were followed a bit.
-
Fairfax Residents,
I spoke with our friends this morning regarding the four wheeler. They are very thankful that so many people in Fairfax are supportive of them. The family would still like to remain anonymous but have asked me to post a description of the stolen property.
2007 Yahama Grizzly 400 4 Wheeler ( Green In Color )
The family used the machine to plow their driveway in the winter. Any information leading to the individuals that have the machine would be appreciated.
Regards
Dave Shea
I have an eye out for it here between Anchorage and Palmer!!
-
When Jim and I had our business up where the daycare is, we were always having somethink stolen. Believe me, the law never did a thing. You find out who they were, report them, take them to court and they got a slap on their hands and were told never to do it again. We also had many tires punched when they were parked there. This was about 20 years ago. Does it want you to take the law into your own hands? YES....................................
-
Correct me if I'm wrong Josh, but I don't think we need to register our ATVs with the dmv in vermont. Usually when something like this happens a posse is what it comes down to. About 14 years ago there was someone running thru fairfax, fletcher, and fairfield stealing farmers atvs and even burning some of them. There was alot of speculation as of what happened but lets just say all of a sudden people weren't missing 4-wheelers anymore.
Yes, if you are going to operate an ATV off of your own property on public roads or on any VASA trail in the state of Vermont you are required to have it registered. Does this always happen? No. Also farmers are not required to register their ATVs if they are using them in a farm capacity
-
The worse part about having an ATV stolen is in most cases the person or persons stealing it are simply stealing it to beat on it and joy ride so most times if it is recovered it's not in working condition. I recovered one 2 years ago after meeting the ATV on the road at 11 pm I decided to turn around and see what the individual was up to. By the time I caught up to the fourwheeler it was abandon in the ditch with antifreeze spraying everywhere and the ignition busted out. Turns out it had just been stolen from a house 1 mile down the road didn't take the thief long to render the machine in operable. Just another case of someone have zero respect for other peoples property!!